(Express delivery of the two sessions) Li Ganjie talked about the falsification of environmental monitoring data: China News Agency, Beijing, March 11 (Reporter Li Chun). On the issue of falsification of environmental monitoring data, Li Ganjie, Minister of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, responded in Beijing on March 11, saying, "We hate it.".

On the same day, the second session of the 13th National People's Congress held a press conference, and Li Ganjie answered questions from Chinese and foreign journalists on issues related to "fighting a good battle against pollution".

"I have repeatedly said that the management and management of our ecological environment are like a building. You should make this building, the ultra-low emission dust meter, stand still. The key point of Zui is that the middle pillar must be solid and reliable, and our monitoring is the big pillar. If the big pillar cannot support, the building will not support, and it will collapse." Li Ganjie said, The quality of environmental monitoring data is also the lifeblood of our environmental protection work. There should be no problems.

He said that after years of efforts, fundamental changes have taken place. Our monitoring data is true, accurate and comprehensive.

According to Li Ganjie, the Ministry of Ecology and Environmental Protection has taken three measures.

First, Make them dare not. If problems are found, they should be investigated and dealt with immediately and seriously, and the ultra-low CEMS system is not just a scratch. For example, two typical cases of zui that have been released to the public, one is the case of monitoring data fraud in Xi'an, and the other is the case of monitoring data fraud in Linfen, Shanxi. There are not only administrative penalties, but also criminal penalties. In a case in Linfen, 16 people went in, which was unexpected in the past. For a monitoring data, 16 people were criminally punished.

Second, let them not. Through the reform and innovation of the system and mechanism, in addition, civil air defense and technical defense can not be achieved. In the past, our national control points were monitored by local authorities, nominally the national control points, but actually the local authorities were responsible for the operation and maintenance, who was assessed and who was monitored. We are now innovating the system, and those who assess will monitor. Our assessment of national control points is our monitoring. We invite a third party to monitor instead of local monitoring, and we have a strict management system for the third party.

Third, make them unwilling. Of course, there is still a gap to let him not say frankly, because the pressure of the assessment is great, and he is prone to use his head when he cannot complete it. We have repeatedly stressed that we should make publicity, and at the same time, we should seriously investigate and deal with problems, and we should also give rewards, encouragement and support to those who do really well in some policies and other aspects. VOCs online monitoring system publicity guides everyone to realize its importance and do a good job in monitoring.